National commendation for the Trust’s Medical Education Team

 

Maggie Johnson The Medical Education Team within Cumbria Partnership NHS Foundation Trust will receive national commendation from the General Medical Council (GMC) for their project called the Medical Education Reviewers (MER) process.

The MER process makes sure the trainers whom oversee doctors in training, continually develop through feedback and that they use reflective practice in their role as trainers. As well as national commendation 15 other Trusts across the north-west have expressed an interest in implementing the process.

Maggie Johnson, Medical Education & Development Manager for Cumbria Partnership NHS Foundation Trust said: “Each year trainers have to submit evidence to meet GMC trainer standards and we wanted to make this effective by encouraging trainers to self-reflect. The MER process is a really innovative approach to underpin the educational development of the trainers’ evidence using reflective practice and developmental feedback.

“This focus underpins lifelong learning and embodies the Trust’s vison and values to ensure a better experience for medical students and PG trainees which ultimately deliver better patient safety, experience and care both now and in the future.”

Medical Education recently delivered a regional masterclass on the trust’s Medical Education Reviewers process and in early 2016 it will be included in the GMC guidance as notable practice.

Dr Sam Dearman, Director of Medical Education for Cumbria Partnership NHS Foundation Trust said: “I am naturally delighted and proud that the GMC will be including our Medical Education Reviewers Process as notable practice. It is another example of our department, and our trust, hitting way above our weight.

“MER puts solid educational principles at its core, rather than being a limited exercise in compliance. Medical education includes not only the team but critically all the doctors whom also work as trainers and teachers, we have a lot of talented and committed people. Although we developed MER as a team, it is the brain child of our Medical Education & Development Manager Mrs Maggie Johnson, I certainly can’t do my job without her and the trust is very lucky to have her.”

Maggie added: “The MER project has given the whole team an opportunity to be creative and generate ground-breaking solutions and is truly a team effort and achievement translating the vision and ideas into a practical sustainable solution.”

6 Ways Continuing Medical Education Must Change

The traditional academic, research-driven, information-sharing model of CME is not enough to address the realities of medicine in 2015 and beyond. The healthcare profession is changing rapidly, but continuing education for healthcare professionals is all too often stuck in the past. Today’s HCPs can’t just receive information about the latest research—they have to learn how to adapt it to their practice needs and patient base, work with the full range of other HCPs on their patient teams to implement it, and be able to show improvements in both their patients’ health and their practices.

In part one of a three-part series based on a recent MeetingsNet webinar, Velvet Chainsaw’s Executive Vice President of Education and Engagement Jeff Hurt outlines six trends that are driving change in healthcare today. In this article, he explains how continuing healthcare professional development must shift as well to meet the needs of today’s HCPs. Part three provides some techniques you can use to align your educational activities with the needs of your HCP learners. Also, check out the Learner’s Bill of Rights Hurt and the audience developed during the webinar.

1. Rein in the research—take a performance-outcome approach.

Much of CPD is still based on disseminating the latest research, not on helping HCPs learn how to better communicate with their patients and teach patients how—and why—to follow their treatment plans, Hurt said.

He asked the audience what role research plays in their education. They responded overwhelmingly that research is vital to what they do, from using it to identify practice gaps and determine best practices, to keeping physicians up to date. “It’s important because it’s used to shape physician behavior, diagnosis, and patient care,” said one person. Several said that the majority of what is presented at their meetings is research. But, added one person, “doctors need to know how to apply these advances to their practice,” not just learn the data.

Hurt agreed, saying, “We have to build a bridge between academic research and practitioner inquiry.” While the data can advance a field, data alone may not be enough to improve an HCP’s practice. “How can HCPs apply the research? What does it mean to their practices, their patients?” Because research often is conducted by academics, not practicing clinicians, it may look at just the broader impact on patients as a whole, not the local patient base of a particular HCP’s practice. “Too much of what happens in medical meetings is a research-based, linear process focused on control and prediction. We need to shift to a cyclical process that is focused on providing practitioner insight into how they can improve.”

2. Go on a session diet.

“It’s no longer about the volume of information you present, it’s about the value” to HCPs and their patients, said Hurt. “The majority of your meetings need to go on a session diet. You need to target your sessions more closely to your HCPs’ needs,” which may have more to do with teaching HCPs how to reach, and teach, their than just sharing the academic research with them.

3. Focus on outcomes, not satisfaction with the meeting.

Healthcare education also has to take more of an outcomes approach, which means your evaluations also will have to change to reflect HCP performance improvement in their practices, not just their satisfaction immediately post-activity, said Hurt. You now need to measure the extent to which HCPs can—and do—demonstrate what they’ve learned back in their practices.

“What if your jobs as medical meeting providers depended on the performance outcomes from your education, just as Medicaid reimbursement depends on outcomes beyond the patient’s hospital stay? Just as ACOs are moving care beyond the hospital setting, we must move our focus beyond the conference session to performance in practice,” Hurt said.

4. Provide a better experience, because a better experience encourages better outcomes.

Most organizations still use learning methods that aren’t effective in helping HCPs—and, ultimately, their patients—learn. “If you asked most HCPs, they would say their best learning experiences come from interactions with colleagues, residency, fellowships, and on-the-job training, not in meetings, said Hurt.

Think about how you could change just 10 percent of your educational offerings to be more focused on outcomes and providing real-world learning examples, Hurt challenged the audience. “It’s time for medical meetings to live and breathe evidence-based education.”

5. Engage the audience in their own learning. Because the word gets thrown around a lot, he asked the audience what “engagement” means to them. Among their responses were: active listening, real-time interaction, participatory activities that get learners’ full attention, getting learners involved in designing the education, having learners draw their own conclusions rather than be asked to parrot back a solution that is handed to them—in short, having an involved audience that is thinking about and interacting with the content.

“We used to think that if you had an audience facing forward with their eyes on the stage and not on their phones, they were actively engaged,” said Hurt. “Wrong. We have no idea if those people are engaged. We’ve become very good at ‘camouflaged listening’—looking forward, putting a smile on our faces, while we’re actually counting ceiling tiles and thinking about lunch or incoming e-mail. Engagement in learning means the speaker needs to shut up every now and then and let people think, and then discuss what they learned.” Also, ask yourself if you are helping learners understand why the information presented is important—“sometimes you need to spoonfeed them the connection,” he said.

6. Incorporate peer-to-peer interaction and group learning. Hurt said that the “working out loud” movement that’s sweeping the education community calls for people to process information together in groups, connecting with past experiences, and predicting how each individual plans to use what they learn. This helps them transfer the new knowledge to their jobs, Hurt said. It’s also vital to provide followup activities, support, and possibly the tools they will need to apply what they learn to their practices.

How do you know if attendees have learned something? “When they can put it in their own words and teach it to someone else,” Hurt said. “We are really bad judges of knowing when we learn something. If all we do is mimic the presenter, we may be misleading ourselves into thinking we learned it.”

Wolters Kluwer to Publish the Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions

Newswise — December 3, 2015 – Wolters Kluwer is pleased to announce a new publishing partnership with The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions (JCEHP), which provides the latest research and perspectives on facilitating lifelong learning for health professionals. JCEHP is the official journal of the Alliance for Continuing Education in the Health Professions, the Society for Academic Continuing Medical Education, and the Council on CME, the Association for Hospital Medical Education. The journal is part of Wolters Kluwer’s Lippincott Williams & Wilkins portfolio of nearly 300 medical, nursing and allied health titles.

JCEHP Gets New Website and Other Upgraded Features
The Fall 2015 issue of JCEHP, the first to be published by Wolters Kluwer, was posted today. JCEHP publishes original research, reviews, and commentary of interest to all involved in theory, practice, and policy related to lifelong learning for healthcare professionals.

The new partnership includes an upgraded journal website, www.JCEHP.org. Once registered, individual and institutional subscribers will be able to access full journal content—including the ability to search, read, and "favorite" any article throughout journal's 35-year history.

The full-featured website can be accessed on smartphones or other mobile devices through a responsive mobile version. The new website also offers a streamlined electronic manuscript submission, review, and tracking process. To learn about submitting, visit http://www.editorialmanager.com/jcehp.

JCEHP is the official journal of the Alliance for Continuing Education in the Health Professions, the Society for Academic Continuing Medical Education, and the Council on CME, the Association for Hospital Medical Education. Members of those societies will continue to receive the journal as a benefit of membership.

JCEHP will continue to publish on a quarterly schedule, with Curtis A. Olson, PhD, as Editor-in-Chief. "Our partnership with Wolters Kluwer ensures JCEHP's continued success in the rapidly evolving world of scholarly publication," Dr. Olson comments. "Our readers and authors will benefit from improved access to full text, better integration with social media and digital devices, and many other features that only a leading global publisher can provide."

About JCEHP
The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.

About Wolters Kluwer
Wolters Kluwer is a global leader in professional information services. Professionals in the areas of legal, business, tax, accounting, finance, audit, risk, compliance and healthcare rely on Wolters Kluwer's market leading information-enabled tools and software solutions to manage their business efficiently, deliver results to their clients, and succeed in an ever more dynamic world.

Wolters Kluwer reported 2014 annual revenues of €3.7 billion. The group serves customers in over 170 countries, and employs over 19,000 people worldwide. The company is headquartered in Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands. Wolters Kluwer shares are listed on NYSE Euronext Amsterdam (WKL) and are included in the AEX and Euronext 100 indices. Wolters Kluwer has a sponsored Level 1 American Depositary Receipt program. The ADRs are traded on the over-the-counter market in the U.S. (WTKWY).

For more information about our products and organization, visit www.wolterskluwerhealth.com, follow @WKHealth or @Wolters_Kluwer on Twitter, like us on Facebook, follow us on LinkedIn, or follow WoltersKluwerComms on YouTube.

Harvard Medical School Launches Arts Initiative

Harvard Medical School

After years of planning, Harvard Medical School this fall launched a formal initiative to integrate the arts and humanities into the traditionally hard-sciences focused campus in an effort to cultivate more empathetic medical professionals.

The “Arts&Humanities@HMS” initiative— planning for which began in 2011— supports the arts in part by raising money to create fellowships for Medical School affiliates interested in the intersection of art and medicine. The initiative also looks to create more opportunities for students to explore music, visual arts, and drama by hosting events, including case narrative readings and performances by the Longwood Symphony Orchestra.

The initiative, which the school approved in June, comes at a time when universities across the nation are reimagining medical education as a more holistic growth process. For example, increasing numbers of students are taking gap years before medical school to reflect on their goals. And this fall, the Medical School rolled out a drastic overhaul of its curriculum, which focuses on “active learning” teaching methods like flipped classrooms.

Students and faculty alike have already expressed interest in increasing the number of arts-based offerings at the school. A 2012 survey of Medical School affiliates indicated that “there are over 1,000 people who are interested in the role of arts and humanities in medicine,” according to professor David S. Jones, who has helped lead and donated to the arts initiative.

Jones said studying humanities will help aspiring doctors better relate to their patients.

“All the doctors who are involved in the arts will say [that the arts] make them better doctors,” he said.

Prior to the launch of the Medical School’s new initiative, the arts and humanities had already occupied an informal presence on campus, according to Ronald A. Arky, a professor there who has been involved with medical education for more than 20 years. For example, he said, a decade-old elective course “Training the Eye” offers first-year medical students the opportunity to critique art and apply those skills to a clinical setting.

“Even back in the 1980s, I’ve actually participated with students in visiting the Museum of Fine Arts, or museums in Cambridge, and so forth,” Arky said. “It’s been there, but needed to be brought to the fore.”

Currently, Jones said, he and others involved in the initiative are trying to gauge student interest to best tailor the arts to the Medical School. Ultimately he hopes to “foster a more artistically inclusive community” and curb the notion that, especially at Harvard, the arts and medicine are mutually exclusive.

“Students say they feel like they have to turn the humanities part of their brain off when they come to HMS,” Jones said. “One of our goals is to make sure that no one at our medical school ever says that again.”

—Staff writer Melanie Y. Fu can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter @MelanieYFu.

—Staff writer Jiwon Joung can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter @YunaJoung.

source: http://www.thecrimson.com

The most in-demand doctors and why Psychiatrists, PCPs see strong demand for their roles in chronic condition management

A new ranking of the most-sought specialties from physician recruiting firm Merritt Hawkins finds that population health management and a shift to team-based care are driving strong demand for primary care providers (PCPs), but that hospital recruitment of doctors has declined for the first time since 2003-2004.
The report is based on more than 3,100 physician and advanced practitioner search assignments the company received between April 1, 2014, and March 31, 2015. The most-recruited specialties were:

  1. Family medicine;
  2. Internal medicine;
  3. Psychiatry;
  4. Hospitalist;
  5. Nurse practitioner;
  6. Ob/gyn;
  7. Orthopedic surgery;
  8. Emergency medicine;
  9. Pediatrics; and
  10. General surgery.

Demand for PCPs, psychiatrists

Overall, six of the 10 most-recruited specialties were related to primary care. Kurt Mosley, VP of strategic alliances at Merritt Hawkins, says the demand for primary care positions reflects the rise of team-based care and population health management. "For a while the specialists were the key to everything because they generated inpatient revenues," he explains. "Now it is team-based health, the chronic care model."

The relationship between mental health and population health management is also driving increased demand for psychiatrists, Mosley says. The latest report ranks psychiatry higher than it has been in the 27 years tracked by Merritt Hawkins. Demand is expected to increase further, as almost half of psychiatrists are expected to retire over the next five years, according to Mosley.

Hospitals' physician recruitment declines

However, hospitals accounted for only 51% of total recruitment in the survey—down from 64% over the past two years, marking the first decline since 2003-2004. Merritt Hawkins attributed the drop to:

  1. Hospital closures, especially in rural areas;
  2. Budget sequestration;
  3. Declines in in federal disproportionate share payments;
  4. States deciding not to expand Medicaid through the Affordable Care Act; and
  5. Non-hospitals increasing their recruitment efforts.

"It's more of a diversified market," says Travis Singleton, a senior VP at Merritt Hawkins.

Singleton expects hospital recruitment of physicians will increase in the coming years because of the Supreme Court's recent ruling upholding the federal exchange subsidies in King v. Burwell. "We will see more and more hospitals get more into the game," he says. "The course is set."

Pay still lags behind demand

Despite high demand for PCPs, their compensation still lags behind other specialties. Merritt Hawkins found that the average primary care doctor it recruited made $198,000 last year, significantly less than most other specialists—such as urologists (ranked 14th most-recruited), who made an average of $412,000.
Don Beckstead, program director for Altoona Family Physicians Residency, hopes the pay gap will begin to narrow as the role of primary care doctors changes. "I would argue that family docs these days are seeing more and more difficult patients and handling more and more difficult patients and therefore should be reimbursed accordingly," he says (Commins [1],HealthLeaders Media, 7/15; Commins [2], HealthLeaders Media, 7/15; Henry, Healthcare DIVE, 7/21).

Source: https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2015/07/22/the-most-in-demand-doctors